تأثير التدريب الإتقاني بأستخدام جياز قاذف الك ا رت في تعميم ميارتي الضربتين الامامية والخمفية بالتنس لمظلاب

Abstract

Through my observing of the tennis game held in college of Physical Education and Sport Science and despite the effort made by the teaching faculty regarding the tennis course used in college in teaching the students the game's main skills using advanced and up to date ways, it lacked the educational tools in which contribute in assisting in the process of learning in fundamental and active way, and it’s the reason why we suffer through learning, and if there was an advanced way of learning combined with the efforts made by the teaching faculty, then it would enhance the way we learn and we could be creative and fast in acquiring the game skills. So, the researcher deems it anecessity to learn by the Proficiency Training Method for it being very suitable in observing the differences between the beginners in using electronic ball ejector that gives the exercising and repetition for all learners to reach a better level in the craftiness ability for the tennis basic skills, specially (the foregroung and background ground hits skills). A sample has been selected from Third Grade Students (beginners) randomly, and (40) students has been chosen to represent the percentage (513, 20%) of the total research community that convey (195) students, they were distributed randomly into two experimental groups of (20) in each. The experimental group applied the Proficiency Training Method using the electronic cannon, while the regulator group applied the common method used in college that is the classic way (the Imperative). The college ground and table tennis varsity team players has been eliminated. The researcher used (Hewitt ) modified trials to gauge the craftiness ability for (the foreground and background hits) skills. These trials is rationed and designed for both college students sexes, beginners and progressives, using the statistics bag (SPSS) in measuring the statistician processes, and the results showed a moral differences between the before and after trials in favor of the after trial in the tests used in this research.