Using International Quality Range Assessment (IQRA) as an Online Assessment in The Development of Insan Rabbani
Abstract
This change is driven by the accelerating technical and ethnic evolution of our society and the concomitant need for all students to become competent lifelong learners. If assessments are to support improvements in student learning, their results must inform students how to do better the next time. This will require communication of results that transmit sufficient understandable details to guide the learner’s actions. In such contexts, to have a productive impact on the learner, the nature of our assessment practices must continue to evolve in specific directions. For instance, the assessment results must go beyond merely providing judgments about student performance to providing rich descriptions of student performance. In other words, if assessments are to support improvements in students learning, their results must inform students how to do better the next time; assessment for learning and not only assessment of learning. This paper seeks to address the above concerns by describing the use of online assessment, in detailing out rich descriptions of student performance as related to the specified educational objectives. We describe this in terms of students’ becomingness. It is organised as follow: (a) Human and Development (b) Insan Rabbani as Target of Human Development (c) Education in Human Development (d) Assessment in the Education process to be Insan Rabbani (e) ICT as enabler of IQRA (f) Conclusion.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
• Al-Alusi, Alamah abi al-Fadl Syihabudin as-Sayid Mahmud al-Alusi al-Baghdadi. (1987). Tafsir ruh al-maani. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
• Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Al-Naquib. 1985. Islam, Secularism, and the Philosophy of the Future. London: Mansell.
• Al Attas (1990) The Nature of Man and the Psychology of the Human Soul (Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilisation (ISTAC))
• Al Attas (1990) The Intuition of Existence (Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilisation (ISTAC)).
• Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Al-Naquib. 1979. Aims and Objectives of Islamic Education. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: Hodder and Stoughton.
• Al-Baidhowi, Nasruddin Abi Said Abdullah bin Umar bin Muhamad Syirazi al-Baidhowi. (1968). Tafsir Baidhowi. Beirut: Daril Jil
• Arifin, H.M. (1991). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Puro, P., & Mergendoller, J. (1992). Translating motivation into thoughtfulness. In H. H. Marshall (Ed.), Redefining student learning (pp. 207–241, p. 209). New York: Ablex Publishing Corporation. [Google Scholar]
• Crooks, T. J., Kane, M. T., & Cohen, A. S. (1996). Threats to the valid use of assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,3, 265–285.
• Desmita. (2012). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
• Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage‐environment fit. Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley Publishing. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning:Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,4, 365–379. doi:10.1080/0969594970040304
• Hattie, J., & Temperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research,77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/ 003465430298487
• Islamic Relief (2014),
• Kline, P. (1998). The new psychometrics: Science, psychology, and measurement. London, England: Routledge.
• Linda Darling-Hammond, (2020), Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development, Journal applied Developmental Science Volume 24, 2020, Issue 2
• Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher,23, 13–23. doi: 10.3102/0013189x023002013
• Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessment. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives,1, 3–62.
• Nichols, P., Mittelholtz, D., Adams, J., & van Deusen, R. (2008). User-centered assessment design. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New. York.
• Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative assessment to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education,5, 85–102. doi:10.1080/0969595980050105
• Sanjaya, Wina. (2008). Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
• Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory into Practice, 44(1), 11–18. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall
• Stiggins R.J. (2005) Assessment for learning. Paper presented at the ETS/Assessment Training Institute’s International Conference: Promoting Sound Assessment in Every Classroom, Portland OR, September 2005.
• Tormey, R (2003) Teaching Social Justice: Intercultural and Development Education Perspectives on Education’s Context, Content and Methods, Limerick: Mary Immaculate College, and Dublin: Ireland Aid
• Stobart, G. (2009). Determining validity in national curriculum assessments. Educational Research,51, 161–179. doi:10.1080/00131880902891305
• Wiggins, G. (1999). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
• Webb, M. E. (2010). Beginning teacher education and collaborative formative e-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,35, 597–618
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.